all down to quad uplifts? what bull.
when we first went up there with the quad no one had a problem, far from it!!!
2nd time we went up there some bloke had words with us explained the deal, and was fine, we went. wont do it again.
BUT where is this forestry sign does it say about the uplifts?
your shanky building is the problem by the looks off it.


Bricktop.

Having read your somewhat biased view I felt that you would benefit from the following link

http://www.forestry.gov.uk/forestry/INFD-76TH2G

Losing  a quad through ignorance could prove costly. Whilst building on private land maybe tolerated by the FC using an uninsured vehicle or a road legal vehicle for that matter can and does involve the police and courts.

twas a mint track too

ive ridden that track and its got nothing to pull down anway.

got any other venues you can add to this thread and be constructive?

so are you the dude that built the steep-ass track

maybe not all down to quad uplifts but I think in the eyes of the forestry that was the final straw. they quite simply couldn't ignore what was going on any longer.

in the longer term, i think it was a good thing. the jumps and drops that were being built weren't sustainable and I never thought triscombe was really the place for them. The stuff on the far side of the valley goes back to how triscombe used to be, not the jump, huck, jump motorways that sprung up over the last year or so.


there was never any chance of a race there, the infrastructure simply isnt there and i believe the forestry got sued bigtime a long time back when there used to be XC races run in those woods.