Pages: 1 [2]
|
 |
|
Author
|
Topic: EOS 5D (Read 509 times)
|
gingerninja76
Guest
|
 |
Re: EOS 5D
« Reply #15 on: July 02, 2008, 12:41:11 PM » |
|
And again you miss the point. I would keep my 20D which is perfectly fine, and get a 5D for other, non actiony photoy stuff. if you think you will be using it more than your 20d then cool. but it would seem silly to have a 2nd camera thats better than you main. the 40d is much better than the 20d and as good as a 5d apart from the crop factor, and if you do the maths its a higher res sensor for its size. at the end of the day its all down to personal taste. id go for the 40d and stand a couple of meters back, oh and save 500 quid, that or wait to see what the new 5d is like cos it will be at least 5fps.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
LR
God Like!
    
Offline
Gender: 
Posts: 1631
|
 |
Re: EOS 5D
« Reply #16 on: July 02, 2008, 12:50:52 PM » |
|
And again you miss the point. I would keep my 20D which is perfectly fine, and get a 5D for other, non actiony photoy stuff. the 40d is much better than the 20d and as good as a 5d apart from the crop factor, and if you do the maths its a higher res sensor for its size. Its all good in saying the 40D is a high resolution sensor for its size, but the sensor is not as high quality, its not just the fact its a "full frame" sensor, its the fact that the pixels are larger and therefore higher quality. There are a lot of things that make the 5D better. One main thing for me is the size. The 5D is a hefty camera and it feels good in the hand, the 40 is still a relatively small camera, and doesn't have that comfort of a larger body. I personally think that if your going on about the "speed" of the camera then your a crap photographer. I personally hate nothing more than press photographers standing next to you using burst mode, then going back and deleting all the bad pictures. It takes all the skill out of the image. The 5D in theory is no slower than the 40D, infact it may be quicker. What you have to remember, is that the 5 is handling up to 60mb RAW files, and the 40 is only working with 20-30mb. A lot of a camera's speed is down to what CF card you use and the processor inside, not down to how many frames it can shoot per second. If I were you, I would keep your 20D and stick a telephoto lens on that and use the crop factor to get a bit of extra reach and use a 5D for shorter stuff, where its nice to get a true wide angle. If you need to use burst mode to take good pictures, then you should consider if your even a good enough photographer for a 400D.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
gingerninja76
Guest
|
 |
Re: EOS 5D
« Reply #24 on: July 02, 2008, 23:18:22 PM » |
|
id agree with ady if you want to learn how to take photos properly shoot film. ive shot s**t loads of film around the world and got sick of the cost. i now only really shoot b n w film as is still much better than digi. its also handy having a darkroom at home to keep cos down. you also get your full frame for only 100quid. the only thing is you actually have to be able to use a real camera, non of this kiddy digi looking at the back to see if you got the shot  . if the 5d was meant as a sports camera then it would be marketed to and used by pro sports photographers. they dont, they use a 1d, and if full frame was important and fps wasnt they would use a 1ds wouldnt you say? at the end of the day buy what ever you want to use and will help you progress in photography. fyi i shoot a crop digi and med format (admittedly not mine), 35mm and med format film.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 [2]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|