Looks urmm amazing all very good images, id be chuffed with that 

good work. glad you got lightroom to work ok.

I'm not going to comment on your photos, I'm too tired, but from a brief scan through, I'll say this:

You need to have bigger photos - small photos conceal softness, missed focus etc. Big images have nothing to hide, and you want to leave people that view a portfolio with NO doubt over whether you're a technically proficient photographer. We all have images that we don't like viewing big because they're not that sharp, or the high ISO noise is horrible, but they're nice small ('almost' shots); if you think that, the same can be said for any photographer or editor looking at your stuff.

This is advice that I've been given by a staff photographer for a big name magazine, outwith the bike industry, but it is true. Big images = better.

your right about hiding softness and noise but i dont think putting big photographs online would help much. big pictures are cool but they take longer to open, upload and some screens wont fit an image bigger than 600 x 800pixs. no one will be judging your technical ability that much on line. you would need something a bit better than a 600 x 800 72dpi image to judge his technical ability i would think. i wouldnt think you would get anyone giving you work only seeing a web site, they want hard copies or 50mb tiffs.
just my thoughts. dom

That's better!

I have no complaints now... heh heh

No worries, we're all learning, blagging, selling our souls to get published... heh heh.