Pages: [1] 2
|
 |
|
Author
|
Topic: lacking of dual slalom down south (Read 538 times)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Seb_C
Senior
   
Offline
Gender: 
Posts: 380

|
Exactly, dual should be totally non contact.
If you crash in dual it doesn't matter how quickly you get up (unless the other guy crashes too). The way they run it in the US is:
Rider 1 in lane A, Rider 2 in lane B. Race down the course, stay in lane, never touch each other. When the first rider crosses the finish, the timer starts. When the second rider crosses the finish, the timer stops.
Rider 1 in lane B, Rider 2 in lane A. Race again. If the rider that came 2nd in the first heat wins the second heat by more than the first place rider did in the first heat, they win overall. If not, then they lose.
If you crash in the first heat and come down 30 seconds after the first place rider, you don't have to make up 30 seconds in the second heat. The gap is pegged at a maximum of 1.5 seconds. So if you come second by 0.1 seconds in the first heat, that's all you have to make up. If you come second by 1.5 seconds, you have 1.5 seconds to make up. If you come second by a whole minute, you still only have 1.5 seconds to make up.
It's less about getting a good gate and defending all the way down the course than 4X, and more about riding as fast as you can. I think it's an equally valid discipline as 4X, but has it's disadvantages for running a race meeting. It's less exciting to watch, and requires you run 4 times as many motos as you would in a 4X knockout (as you only have 2 riders at a time, not 4, and each pairing has to race twice, once in each lane). You could of course just do it on a single run basis, and ignore the averaging of two runs - but one lane will always be faster than the other so that would create arguments when everyone in the slower lane loses and start whining about how unfair it all is.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: [1] 2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|