southerndownhill.com advertisement.png, 0 kB
Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register.
December 05, 2008, 10:02:37 AM
Show unread posts since last visit.
Forum Help Calendar Login Register
News: Want to help test the new forum template? Click here.
 

+  southerndownhill.com - Forum
|-+  General
| |-+  Technical Advice (Moderators: Col @ FLi, Mop Head)
| | |-+  Vanilla RC vs 5th element
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. « previous next »
Pages: [1] Go Down Print
Author Topic: Vanilla RC vs 5th element  (Read 165 times)
lee_erm
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 27



Vanilla RC vs 5th element
« on: August 25, 2008, 13:42:58 PM »

Just got an Orange 222. Only had the frame a few months, had to replace my old DH frame with something even older due to lack of funds Undecided. Loving the 222, only problem i've had with it is the rear shock, a vanilla rc. Been using it out in france for the past week, it varries so much as it heats up, (not as noticable back on UK tracks), it isn't tuneable enough, has a very vauge mid stroke feel (maybe that's the frame?) Compession adjuster just varries how harsh the shock feels. To get a nice amount of sag, I end up blowing through the travel too easily too.

I also have a 5 way 5th element which i've just got hold off. This is in need of a service however.

Question is, which shock should I keep? I reckon a tune up/change of valving is needed on the vanilla for sure, PUSH possibly? The 5th needs a service, so I could get that shim stacked at the same time. I'm guessing TF still offer this. Or, I could sack them both off and get a dhx5. What do you reckon my best option is?
Logged
david taylforth
God Like!
*****
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 1934


You'll be the first to go unless you think


Re: Vanilla RC vs 5th element
« Reply #1 on: August 25, 2008, 13:46:49 PM »

You need a platform shock for a bike like a 222.

Therefore I would keep the 5th and get it serviced. Or if you can, look for a dhx.
Logged
ali.
Senior
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1252



Re: Vanilla RC vs 5th element
« Reply #2 on: August 25, 2008, 13:58:40 PM »

I had the same problem with my patriot. To get it feeling nice means it bottoms waaaay too easily. I got a 5th (as it's the only other piggy back shock that fits) and it's sorted the problem  Smiley
Logged

NS ORANGE
La Suisse!
DMR RHYTHM FRAME FOR SALE, £50 POSTED.
mtballtheway
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 116



Re: Vanilla RC vs 5th element
« Reply #3 on: August 25, 2008, 14:14:56 PM »

i had a tuned 6way 5th on my 224 felt brilliant, go for the 5th
Logged

DH bike

who wants this stuff
Wassell
God Like!
*****
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 1482


"Yeah, but i pinned the pussy route..."


Re: Vanilla RC vs 5th element
« Reply #4 on: August 25, 2008, 15:59:55 PM »

You need a platform shock for a bike like a 222.

Therefore I would keep the 5th and get it serviced. Or if you can, look for a dhx.

why?

my 222 pedalled extremelly well with the standard RC on it. the high pivot point means the back end will almost lock out when you crank hard anyway, so i cant see why you would need a platform?!?!

the PUSH'd RC i fitted to mine helped it out no end though, the shock could be run softer and faster, and not bottom out or buck you off on big compressions. never rode a 222/3 with a 5th fitted though.
Logged
Pages: [1] Go Up Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

advertisement.png, 0 kB
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.7 | SMF © 2006-2008, Simple Machines LLC Valid HTML 4.01! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.112 seconds with 20 queries.